Thread:Yong feng/@comment-26245895-20150911034616

Since my knowledge of source/code is minimal, I have been doing all my edits simply through the Visual Editor. Most edits just involve removing/moving information and handling links; so far, I've had no difficulty with the tool, nor does it seem that the edits have caused any damage to the articles.

However, I am told that actually Visual Editor is NOT a tool recommended for editing and that it is rather bad to use, as it normally always messes up an article and can destroy everything, and can not be reverted when used.

Quite honestly, every edit I have made I faced no trouble; all articles that were simply edited came out fine, no troubles or anything, nor have I received any complaints about the edited articles prior to this message. I always double check to make sure the article will turn out clean, and that everything will be posted correctly, and so far, it has.

Though I would like to know that, if it is true, if all my previous edits are now considered bad since I have used only the Visual Editor to implement them. If so, I'll refrain from editing from this point, and will gladly turn over any edit made to be redone through the source editor. While I enjoy immensely helping out the Wiki the best way I can, if Visual Editor is a no, then I have no choice but to stop, as I would not want to further damage the site.

Thank you for your cooperation; sorry if my actions were deemed harmful or incorrect. 