Board Thread:Official Wiki Discussions/@comment-27231734-20160907171251/@comment-3289548-20160907225617

TheMightyContorted wrote: I'm the one being arrogant? I said that I hated acting like a cocky, stuck up jerk but what I said was true. There is little to no valid evidence to state that Flaky is Female. The only main member of the HTF crew that says so for sure is Warren. Rhode says he's a Boy, and both Ken Pontac and Kenn Navarro say his gender is up to interpretation. Also, you can't "win" an argument. It's a discussion, not a competition. The closest you can come to "winning" is proving the opposing side wrong while not being proved wrong yourself. I did both.

Also, as I have stated, if you're not even going to bother reading my replies, then you don't have the credibility to state that my argument was flawed. I used common sense and all my points were either backed up by reasonable logic or pure facts. None of you were able to prove me wrong, in fact. Sure, the community has spoken. But as long as they believe in information that has been proven false and invalid, I still hold the intelligent higher ground. What the vote ends on doesn't matter to me.

Honestly, you need to stop antagonizing me. Just because I proved you wrong doesn't mean you get to be rude and genuinely unkind to me. I'm not just some asshole that wanted to kick up some controversy so I could brag about "oh, how great I am!". You can sit there and smile all you want, but the information you're basing his gender on is still wrong. You are the definition of arrogant. You are also an expert in controdicting yourself. You are writing that there is no way to win in a discussion. However, there is an exeption if the person can proove the other person wrong. And yet below you write that none of us could proove you wrong, which mean that you are already declaring yourself the "winner". Even if it's obviously just your own opinion. Just as it's just my own opinion that it's just BS. As for your replies, this is how debates work in the real world. The debater is getting an amount of time and then the host breaks it up and then go to the next debater. Are you seriously believing that somebody cares to listen to the first debater if just ignores the host and just goes on and on? Well, you was mostly just repeating yourself, so it was not like your longer comments gave me anything new. I like how you first write "Stop antagonizing me!" and in the same sentace continue the arrogance by claiming that you are right and everybody else are wrong.