Board Thread:Voting/@comment-5429623-20160907013047/@comment-27231734-20160907164254

TheMightyContorted wrote:

The confirmation in 2012 was biased and non-neutral, not taking the other side of the debate into consideration at all. The more recent confirmation from 2014 acknowledges both sides of the argument, referring to the evidence for both of the opposing claims. The more recent one is more reliable than the one stating she is Female. I don't even see why we're voting about this. Nobody has answered my question yet. Did you guys vote back in 2012 when Flaky's gender was said to be Female? The evidence and confirmation was so overwhelming that the idea didn't receive any opposition, so no, we didn't vote because there was no need to. Also not that the wiki wasn't nearly as democratic back then, so votes were a rarity in general. The point is that we're doing a vote now, and this vote's decision will be final until even newer and even more solid confirmation is received.