Board Thread:Official Wiki Discussions/@comment-27231734-20160907171251/@comment-29838289-20160907182249

Mr Creeper500 wrote: "Once again you call one of the show's creators biased and unreliable. He doesn't need to provide evidence seeing as he is counted as evidence. Also you can't call him biased for not seeing both sides of the story because he created the character, so it's his decision and his decision alone as to what Flaky's gender is."

I'm not calling the person who made the post personally biased or unreliable. Where did you get that from? I'm merely pointing out that the information he gave was biased and unreliable. Also, Rhode Montijo designed Flaky. And he has explicitly stated that Flaky is Male since day one. If the person who made the character dictates the gender, then, sorry to break it to you, but Flaky would be Male.

"If anyone here is biased, it's you. You blindly see this post by Kenn and suddenly the whole fandom's supposed to roll over? I highly doubt that'll happen. You completely disregard the fact that the majority opinion remains that Flaky is female."

How am I biased? My personal opinion is that Flaky is Male, but I'm setting that side to decide on a more believable option. One that, for some reason, everybody is against, despite the fact that I have disproved the argument that Flaky is Female over and over in the span of about two days. I'm anything but biased.

Also, it doesn't matter what the opinions of the majority are. As we have previously established, this wiki works on facts, not opinions. The idea that Flaky is Female is not fact. It was an idea that was thrust into the community with flawed evidence and a poor defence. I don't expect the whole fandom to roll over for me. I merely want you to acknowledge your own damn narrative. If the wiki is supposed to state facts and facts alone, then stating that Flaky is Female when he has LITERALLY been confirmed as genderless more recently is going against that logic.

"As a wiki it's our main goal to have as accurate and definite information as possible, and having a page say "Unknown" sure as hell isn't definite. We only have one definite answer and that is that Flaky is a girl, and once again, Warren doesn't need to provide evidence since he designed the character, and therefore, he decides her gender, and from what we've gathered, he decided she's female."

No, it's not definite, but the idea that Flaky is Female is much less accurate and valid than the idea that he's genderless, nonbinary or "Unknown". Hell, even the idea that Flaky is a Boy has more ground to stand on than the Girl argument. Kenn Navarro has given you a much more accurate, believable, reliable and stable argument than Flaky being Female, yet you continue to cling onto false information. Also, for God's sake, Warren didn't design the character. Rhode did, and Rhode, once again, has been stating that Flaky is Male since day one. Once again, your own logic defeats you.