Board Thread:Official Wiki Discussions/@comment-27231734-20160907171251/@comment-29838289-20160907190242

Mr Creeper500 wrote:

"I admit you're right about the Rhode part, sorry, I myself was under false information.

'I still hold firm to me belief, and as hollow as you find Warren's confirmation on her gender, just as hollow do I find your belief that Flaky is male. You're the only person in the past 4 years who felt this argument needed to be brought back to life, almost everyone else has accepted that she's female at this point."'

And those people who accepted that he's Female accepted it under flawed, incorrect information. Simply put, they're wrong. The idea that Flaky is Female was coughed up out of absolutely nowhere. And, initially, the only excuse the people who supported that theory could use was "She has a Female voice actor". A point which I have just proven wrong.

This argument needs to be brought back to life because your wiki is sitting upon a huge, controversial misunderstanding of information. The idea that Flaky is Female has been proven wrong, as I have just demonstrated to you. As long as you have the words "Female (confirmed)" beneath the gender section, you are relaying false information to those who read that page, which is against this exact SAME wiki's rules, might I add.

"And believe you me, that fandom will not easily give in, most of the HTF crew(especially Kenn) likes to leave these things to fandom opinion, and so far fandom opinion is ruling female."

So, in a simplified chain of words, the fandom are ignorant? The idea that Flaky is Female has been proven wrong. Not just by me, but no doubt by people before me. If the fandom doesn't give in to valid information, as well as detailed proof that they have been wrong for the past four years, then I hold the intelligent higher ground. I disproved the entire theory that Flaky was Female. It doesn't matter whether or not I lose the vote because, if I do, the people that vote to oppose the suggestion will do so under the influence of pure ignorance. Some of them have seen my argument, been unable to disprove it, and will vote against the idea anyway. Like I said, ignorance.

"Also, before you use one of my own arguments against me again, I know a wii is supposed to carry the most accurate information possible, but according to most of the responses we get to questions we ask Kenn, he likes leaving what's official and what's not to the fandom. So we will declare official whatever the fandom-based community of this wiki declares official."

Even if that information is flawed and quite clearly illogical and invalid? That's not what a wiki does. Educates people based on reliable information. The information that suggests Flaky is a Girl is flawed, untrustworthy, invalid and generally...well, incorrect. As I stated earlier, allowing the fandom to dictate what's canon and what isn't is very, very stupid because it allows flawed, invalid information to be labelled as canon without MondoMedia's input or approval and, in this instance, that is exactly what has happened.

If the fandom has sat for four years ignoring pure fact, then, you're right, I have no hope to convince them. I mean, if they refuse to listen to Kenn Navarro himself, there's absolutely no hope at all. But, guess what I take away from it anyway? Even if you ban me, which one of you has actually threatened to do, I would still hold the intelligent higher ground. Of course, that doesn't mean I'm saying "Everyone who disagrees with me is stupid!". It's just me stating that I have proven those people wrong. And, trust me, I feel like a complete dickhead for saying that, but facts are facts. And the idea that Flaky is a Girl is not a fact, despite what the fandom says.